296 Mich. 30
295 N.W 547
Decided January 6, 1941
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1941-01-06
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1941-01-06
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1982
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 (concurring in result). I concur in the result on the ground that the financial statement showing defendant’s ability to pay the obligation was not a promise to pay tolling the statute.
¶2 I do not join in holding that the remark made by defendant Drieborg to Mr. Walsh, the attorney for the maker of the note, that he could not and would not pay the note has any bearing upon the issues. Such remark was not made to the payee of the note or to any one representing him and was of no consequence.