People v. Smith-Anthony’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'(1) the taking of someone else's property without consent, (2) movement of the property, (3) with the intent to steal or permanently deprive the owner of the property, and (4) the property was taken from the person or from the person's immediate area of control or immediate presence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The larceny-from-the-person statute punishes pickpockets, purse- and wallet-snatchers, and others who invade the person or 'immediate presence' of the victim to accomplish a theft.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.