Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 Minn. 173 - LaBelle v. LaBelle

LaBelle v. LaBelle’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 1999 · most notably Marriage of Pikula v. Pikula (1985), Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld (1976)

31 state decisions

140197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fish v. Fish · Molto v. Molto · State Ex Rel. Feeley v. Williams · Hanson v. Hanson · State ex rel. Neib v. Krueger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defendant argues that the trial court should be bound by the findings of the referee unless those findings are clearly erroneous. The Ramsey County Family Court referees are provided to assist the judge of the Family Court Division. Minn. St. 484.64, subd. 3. The trial judge must be completely free to exercise his judgment and discretion. For that reason we see no merit in defendant’s contention.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The welfare and best interests of the child are the paramount considerations in selecting one of two parents in whom to place the care, custody, and control of a minor child. Hanson v. Hanson, 284 Minn. 321 , 170 N. W. 2d 213 (1969). In matters of custody, the trial court is vested with a wide discretion, and its determination will not be reversed unless there is a clear abuse of that discretion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.