Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 N.C. 416 - Lloyd v. Babb

Lloyd v. Babb’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

67 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2018 · most notably Martinez Ex Rel. Morales v. Bynum (1983), 174 N.C. App. 266 - Good Hope Hospital, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services (2005)

67 state decisions

22019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reynolds v. Sims · Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Dunn v. Blumstein · Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15 · Carrington v. Rash

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Thus, while we are to treat as true plaintiffs' factual allegations, it is our task to determine whether these allegations as a matter of law demonstrate the adequacy, or lack thereof, of legal administrative remedies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “any agency proceeding, by whatever name called, wherein the legal rights, duties or privileges of a party are required by law to be determined by an agency after an opportunity for an adjudicatory hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “conclusions of law or unwarranted deductions of facts are not admitted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.