State v. Rue’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2013
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Cofield · 267 N.J. Super. 520 - State v. Bielkiewicz · Krupp v. BD. OF EDUC. UN. CTY. REGIONAL HIGH SCH. DIST.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The difference between this ease and Bielkiewicz is that evidence in that case could have supported a finding that defendant Bielkiewicz did not share Pitts’ homicidal state of mind. A jury could reasonably have concluded from his actions that Bielkiewiez was intent on inflicting bodily injury on the victim to help Pitts win the fight, but that he did not share Pitts’ intent to cause death or serious bodily injury. That is not the case here. [State v. Rue, supra, 296 N.J.Super. at 115 , 686 A.2d 348 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jackmon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.