Perry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1998
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Johnson · Close v. Kordulak Bros. · Campbell v. Department of Civil Service · Zelasko v. Refrigerated Food Express · Watson v. Nassau Inn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although petitioner was required to use an employer-authorized vehicle, she was engaged in her daily commute to work and was not directed by her employer to report to a distant job site. Nor was she ... conducting business authorized by her employer at the time of her injury. The record simply will not support a finding of “special-mission.” Therefore, given the legislative intent to amend the “going and coming” rule to allow compensation only in certain specified instances, we conclude petitioner is not entitled to benefits and direct the dismissal of the claim petition. [Id. at 164, 686 A.2d 374 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Perry v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.