Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 NJSUPER 262 - Day v. Lorenc

Day v. Lorenc’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2015

5 state decisions

30199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by or made known to the expert at or before the hearing. If of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in the absence of an independent basis for admissibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.