Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 NJSUPER 363 - Halak v. Scovill

Halak v. Scovill’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2023

5 state decisions

201997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Calder v. Jones · Avdel Corporation v. Mecure

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the mere fact that [the] defendant was never physically present in New Jersey does not preclude a finding that minimum contacts existed so long as the defendant's efforts were purposely directed toward a resident of this State and the defendant was aware that the [act] would have direct consequences in New Jersey. [ Halak, supra, 296 N.J.Super. at 368 , 686 A. 2d 1245 (citing Lebel, supra, 115 N.J. at 327 , 558 A. 2d 1252 ).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The `purposeful availment' requirement ensures that a defendant will not be haled into a jurisdiction solely as a result of `random,' `fortuitous,' or `attenuated' contacts.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is not related directly to the defendant's contacts with the forum state, but is based instead on the defendant's continuous and systematic activities in the forum.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.