State v. Wiberg’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 2011 · most notably United States v. Alexander (1981), State v. Schinzing (1983)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Stone v. Powell · Michigan v. Mosley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. how reliable is the evidence; 2. whether the delay was intentional; 3. whether the delay compounded the effects of other police misconduct; and 4. the length of the delay.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Pierce · State v. Jackson“Application of the exclusionary rule exacts a great cost on societal interests by the proscription, in many cases, of con-cededly relevant and reliable evidence. Against this burden on societal interests, however, must be balanced the deterrence of improper police action that the exclusionary rule promotes. We feel that the balance is not' struck by the rigid exclusion of reliable evidence reasonably related to a violation of [that state’s presentment rule] in every case in which such a violation occurs. [Citations omitted].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[Ajvoid the coercive nature of custodial surroundings by preventing secret interrogation and the resultant pressure to confess. In addition, prompt arraignment insures that an arrested person will be fully advised of his rights by a judicial officer soon after his arrest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Waddell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.