State v. Steingraber’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
5
states following
June 2005
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3109
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Sabbath v. United States · 71 Cal. 2d 287 - Greven v. Superior Court · State v. Mendoza · State v. Kietzke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"An unannounced intrusion into a dwellingwhat § 3109 basically proscribes is no less an unannounced intrusion whether officers break down a door, force open a chain lock on a partially open door, open a locked door by use of a passkey, or, as here, open a closed but unlocked door." [Footnote omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sakellson“The officer executing a search warrant may break open any building, structure, or container or anything therein to execute the warrant if, after giving notice of his authority and purpose, he is refused admittance^]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Iverson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.