Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 Or. 259 - Bonner v. Arnold

Bonner v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Halleck v. HALLECK · Pietro v. Leonetti · Florio v. Greenspan · Bonner v. Arnold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is clear * * * that if the law would require contribution from the mother’s estate for one-half the debt, the estate would receive no benefit because at the time of the mother’s death the entire property vested solely in the son. Contribution is an equitable remedy used to prevent unjust enrichment. If it were applied in this case, it would result in unjust enrichment rather than prevent it. If the property had been held as tenants in common and the estate paid half of the joint obligation, the estate would benefit by an increase in its equity. In this ease, however, the estate would be $20,000 poorer, with nothing to show for the expenditure.” Id. at 291 . (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.