Cannon v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1970
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 72 Okla. Crim. 107 - Ex Parte Bradley · 75 Okla. Crim. 155 - Ex Parte Nye · 72 Okla. Crim. 292 - Ex Parte Ora Wooldridge · 82 Okla. Crim. 272 - Wilson v. State · 84 Okla. Crim. 63 - Shaw v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where an application is made for leave to withdraw a plea of guilty and stand trial, the test in such case is whether there is reasonable ground to believe that the plea of guilty may have been entered as the result of inadvertence, ignorance, misunderstanding, misapprehension, or without deliberation as a result of unseemly haste; and where in light of the whole record, the pleadings, minutes, and the evidence at the hearing on the motion, it appears the plea may have been so entered, and it is apparent the application to withdraw the plea of guilty is in good faith and not for the purpose of delay and to defeat the ends of justice, to deny the application under such conditions will constitute an abuse of discretion.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Manning v. State · Abel v. State““* * * this court does not look with favor upon pleas entered * * * under misapprehension. * * * Even though the court advised the defendant of his rights, it is apparent that the defendant had not had ample time for deliberation, and was laboring under a misapprehension of those rights, and did not fully appreciate the consequences of his act.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bigpond v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.