Hendricks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 1987
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 70 Okla. Crim. 246 - Coleman v. State · 69 Okla. Crim. 103 - Gregg v. State · 8 Okla. Crim. 342 - Fritz v. State · 94 Okla. Crim. 61 - Leeth v. State · 95 Okla. Crim. 418 - Turvey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Alibi’ is physical circumstance and derives its entire potency as a defense from fact that it involves physical impossibility of guilt. “To entitle defense of alibi to consideration, evidence must show that at very time of commission of crime accused was at another place so far away or under such circumstances that he could not, with ordinary exertion, have reached scene of crime so as to have participated in commission thereof.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Baxter v. State · Grimes v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.