Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 P3D 1026 - A.M. v. A.C.

A.M. v. A.C.’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Santosky v. Kramer · Lassiter v. Department of Social Services of Durham County North Carolina · People v. District Court, Second Judicial District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The overriding purpose of the Children's Code is to protect the welfare and safety of children in Colorado by providing procedures through which their best interests can be ascertained and served.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to 'intervene' means to become a party to the litigation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The adjudication represents the court's determination that state intervention is necessary to protect the child and that the family requires rehabilitative services in order to safely parent the child”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.