Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 P.3d 32 - Weilbacher v. Ring

Weilbacher v. Ring’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Watson Bros. Transp. Co. v. Jaffa · Rash v. United States · Hughes v. Foster Wheeler Co. · Hopper v. Hopper · Johnson v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Abuse of discretion exists 'if the [order] is arbitrary, capricious, manifestly unreasonable or the result of an improper motive.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.