Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 Pa. Super. 112 - Stokes v. Thiemann

296 Pa. Super. 112 - Stokes v. Thiemann’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2010

14 state decisions

1201982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kraynick v. HERTZ · E. J. McAleer & Co. v. Iceland Products, Inc. · Gagliardi v. Lynn · Templeton Appeal · Coppage v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have considered this question previously and our position is clear: ‘... lower court will not be reversed either for waiving or refusing to waive non-compliance with procedural rules in the absence of a showing of an abuse of discretion which has caused manifest and palpable injury to the complaining party____’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.