Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 Pa. Super. 382 - Commonwealth v. Gallagher

296 Pa. Super. 382 - Commonwealth v. Gallagher’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably Commonwealth v. Begley (2001), 347 Pa. Super. 64 - Commonwealth v. Frazier (1985)

27 state decisions

140198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Benton v. Maryland · Mahan v. Howell · Commonwealth v. Riggins · Commonwealth v. Silverman · Commonwealth v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “upon the defendant’s conduct during the sentencing colloquy which clearly indicated ... the fact that he had no remorse for his crimes and his utter contempt for the legal process---- A criminal defendant’s attitude, including a lack of contrition for his criminal conduct, is one of the proper criteria upon which a court may exercise its discretion in sentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that even an increase in sentence which is merely designed to correct an inadvertent judicial mistake must be scrutinized as carefully as an increase which results from a reconsideration of sentencing factors or from a judicial change of mind.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.