Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 So. 2d 109 - Flicker v. State

296 So. 2d 109 - Flicker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1977
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harrell v. State · Fisher v. Fisher · 129 So. 2d 693 - HI Holding Company v. Dade County · 137 So. 2d 625 - Scott v. State · 294 So. 2d 691 - Frazier v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... if the Information does in fact designate a specific person to whom the alleged forgery is uttered and published then that becomes a material part of the charge and proof of utterance or publication to another will not sustain the charge of uttering or publishing to the person named.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When the improprieties revealed by the record are such as to cast an unfairly favorable light upon the State and an undeserved unfavorable light upon the defendant the prejudice is apparent and the entire trial is thereby tainted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.