Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 U.S. 10 - Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los Angeles

Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los Angeles’s Empirical Analysis

296 U.S. 10 · 1935

Citation profile

414
cited by 414 later decisions
58
cited 58 times by the Supreme Court
21
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

105 federal appellate · 33 district · 136 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 414 later decisions (58 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025 · most notably Papasan v. Allain (1986), Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority (1936)

105 federal appellate · 33 district · 136 state decisions — followed in 21 states

8301935194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedCity of Los Angeles v. Borax Consolidated Ltd. (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Crowell v. Benson · Shively v. Bowlby · Donnelly v. United States · Hardin v. Jordan · St.louis Smelting and Refining Company v. Kemp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 414 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[t]he question as to the extent of this federal grant, that is, as to the limit of the land conveyed, ... is necessarily a federal question.'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the average height of all the high waters”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The tideland extends to the high-water mark.... This does not mean, as petitioners contend, a physical mark made upon the ground by the waters; it means the line of high water as determined by the course of the tides. By the civil law, the shore extends as far as the highest waves reach in winter.... But by the common law, the shore “is confined to the flux and reflux of the sea at ordinary tides.” ... It is the land “between ordinary high and low water mark, the land over which the daily tides ebb and flow. When, therefore, the sea, or a bay, is named as a boundary, the line of ordinary high-water mark is always intended where the common law prevails.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.