Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 297 A.2d 889 - Pendleton v. Sard

Pendleton v. Sard’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
10
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

1 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2024

1 district · 21 state decisions — followed in 10 states

70197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Paschall's, Inc. v. Dozier · Alberti v. Moore · Guldberg v. Greenfield · Lundstrom Construction Co. v. Dygert · Bangor Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Robbins Plumbing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[One] a benefit conferred upon the defendant by the plaintiff; [two] an appreciation or knowledge by the defendant of the benefit; and [three] the acceptance or retention by the defendant of the benefit under such circumstances as to make it inequitable for the defendant to retain the benefit without payment of its value.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “may be preserved and enforced by action against the debtor and owner of the property affected and all other parties interested therein, filed with the Superior Court ... in the county ... where the house, building or appurtenances ... on which a lien is claimed is situated within 120 days after the last of the labor or services are performed or labor, materials or services are so furnished ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[Wle conclude that under ordinary and usual cireumstances the equities will not permit the supplier of labor and materials to obtain a personal judgment against the owner with whom he had no contractual dealings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.