Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 297 Ark. 160 - Bowden v. State

Bowden v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently February 2011 · most notably Dixon v. State (1992), Mills v. State (1995)

58 state decisions

4001988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · United States v. Wade · Manson v. Brathwaite · Gilbert v. California · Harrington v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court must begin with the presumption that every person is competent to be a witness. A.R.E. Rule 601. The burden of persuasion is upon the party alleging that the potential witness is incompetent. To meet that burden the challenging party must establish the lack of at least one of the following: (1) the ability to understand the obligation of an oath and to comprehend the obligation imposed by it; or (2) an understanding of the consequences of false swearing; or (3) the ability to receive accurate impressions and to retain them, to the extent that the capacity exists to transmit to the factfinder a reasonable statement of what was seen, felt or heard. (Citing authority.) The competency of a witness is a matter lying within the sound discretion of the trial court and, in the absence of clear abuse, we will not reverse on appeal. (Citing authority.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When a test or experiment is an attempt to reenact the original happening, the essential elements of the experiment must be substantially similar to those existing at the time of the original occurrence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the state did not meet its burden of showing an intelligent and voluntary waiver by Bowden of his right to counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.