In Re Peterson’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Relies on Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · In re Disbarment of Adelman · City of New York v. Seawall Associates · Budget Service Co. v. Better Homes of Virginia, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in order to reorganize her financial affairs. And, it prohibits harassment of the debtor. See, Budget Service Co. v. Better Homes of Virginia, Inc., 804 F.2d 289, 292 (4th Cir.1986). But, the stay does not shield the debtor from all the vicissitudes, aggravations and anxiety of everyday life. (When it rains, debtors protected by the automatic stay get wet). Thus, the Code prescribes a sanction only in two conjunctive circumstances: (1) injury to the debtor; (2) caused by a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re jts/simms, LLC“There appears to be no real injury to the debtor by Chevy Chase Bank’s actions. There was some measure of shock, disturbance, and annoyance, but nothing that would amount to an injury meriting damages. The actual monetary cost to the debtor was minimal and was quickly remedied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Highsmith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.