In Re Stuart’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Mart Corporation v. Cartier Inc 47th Street Photo Inc · Public Citizen v. United States Department of Justice · Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co. · Sullivan v. Stroop · Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United Distribution Cos.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[j]udicial interpretation of a statute outside its literal terms is appropriate only when a literal application of the statute would lead to an absurd or unconstitutional result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Fishel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.