Reed v. Franke’s Empirical Analysis
297 F.2d 17 · 1961
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently September 1993 · most notably Friedman v. United States (1962), Friedman v. United States (1962)
30 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority · Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath · Greene v. McElroy · Estep v. United States · United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The fact that the hearing provided by statute does not precede, but follows, Reed’s separation from the service does not make the hearing inadequate. The statutory review is a part of the protective procedure and due process requirements are satisfied if the individual is given a hearing at some point in the administrative proceedings.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence““Thus the reviewing board is empowered to nullify the action taken if determined to be erroneous and, in lieu thereof, to order an honorable discharge to which Reed claims to be entitled. The findings of the board are subject to review only by the Secretary of the military department affected.” [ 297 F.2d 17 , 27.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We conclude that, where there is a substantial claim that prescribed mili tary procedures violate one’s constitutional rights, the District Courts have jurisdiction to resolve the constitutional questions. [Citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.