Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

297 F.2d 228

Docket No. 13691.

De Lucia v. New Jersey

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted November 17, 1961.

Decided November 29, 1961.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1961-11-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1961

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1961-11-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mario J. De Lucia, pro se.

Stanley E. Rutkowski, Prosecutor of Mercer County, Trenton, N. J., for appellee.

Before KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant unsuccessfully applied to the district court for a writ of habeas corpus. The application was made and this appeal taken in forma pauperis, with appellant acting as his own counsel. A review of the record and appellant's brief discloses material which may have a bearing on the disqualification of a district judge. It does not appear that the matter was brought to the attention of the district court or that it was considered. For this reason, we are vacating the judgment of the district court and remanding for further proceedings.

/297/f2d/228 · .json · Public domain