Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 297 F.2d 595 - United States v. Eisner

United States v. Eisner’s Empirical Analysis

297 F.2d 595 · 1962

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2008 · most notably Aguilar v. Texas (1964), Gurleski v. United States (1968)

42 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions — followed in 11 states

38019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Jones v. United States · Harris v. United States · Marron v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In determining what is probable cause, the Commissioner is not called upon to determine whether the offense charged has in fact been committed. He is concerned only with the question whether there is reasonable grounds to believe at the time of the affidavit that the law was being violated on the premises to be searched. Carney v. United States, 163 F.2d 784 , 786, C.A.9th, cert. denied 332 U.S. 824 , 68 S.Ct. 165 , 92 L.Ed. 400 ; Aderhold v. United States, 132 F.2d 858 , C.A.5th. See: Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 , 161, 45 S.Ct. 280 , 69 L.Ed. 543 .””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.