Moses v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
297 F.2d 621 · 1961
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1010
Relies on Nye & Nissen v. United States · Hyde v. United States · United States v. Peoni · Hyde v. United States · Calvin R. Morgan v. Riverside Mills Company, C. A. Folk, T. I. Ward
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is a general rule that evidence of a crime for which an accused has not been charged in the indictment is inadmissible and constitutes prejudicial error. * * * But where intent and knowledge are essential in proving the offense charged, evidence of transactions so connected with the charge * * * and evidence of other acts similar in nature tending to establish intent and guilty knowledge of the offense in issue * * * are two well established exceptions.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is enough if the party participates, as did the appellant in these cases, in the concerted plan permeating each of the transactions out of which these certificates emanate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.