Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

297 F.2d 811

Docket No. 36, Docket 26712.

Stevenson v. Ribicoff

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Nov. 8, 1961.

Decided Nov. 8, 1961.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1961-11-08

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 1977

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Adams v. Flemming · Walker v. Altmeyer · Gooding v. Willard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1961-11-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*812Sol J. Shapiro, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

¶2Robert M. Hausman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Southern District of New York, New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

¶3Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5We affirm in open court for the reasons stated in Judge Kaufman’s opinion, 200 F.Supp. 705, as there was substantial evidence in the record to support the administrative determination of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying the plaintiff’s application for old age benefits under 42 U.S.C.A. § 402(a). See Walker v. Altmeyer, 137 F.2d 531, 533-34 (2 Cir.1943); Poss v. Ribicoff, 289 F.2d 10 (2 Cir.1961); Gooding v. Willard, 209 F.2d 913, 916 (2 Cir.1954) ; Adams v. Flemming, 276 F.2d 901, 903 (2 Cir. 1960); Barron v. Ribicoff, 295 F.2d 432 (4 Cir.1961).

/297/f2d/811 · .json · Public domain