Scott v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
297 F.3d 589 · 2002
Citation profile
141
cited by 141 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited
17 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Sarchet v. Chater · Clifton v. Chater · Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration · Diaz v. Chater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 141 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“build an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence to [the] conclusion”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[b]y failing to discuss the evidence in light of [the specific listing's] analytical framework, the ALJ has left this Court with grave reservations as to whether his factual assessment addressed adequately the criteria of the listing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“112.05 Mental Retardation: Characterized by significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning with deficits in adaptive functioning. The required level of severity for this disorder is met when the requirements in A, B, C, D, E, or F are satisfied.... D. A valid verbal, performance, or full scale IQ of 60 through 70 and a physical or other mental impairment imposing an additional and significant limitation of function[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.