Raymond E. Hill v. State of Alaska’s Empirical Analysis
297 F.3d 895 · 2002
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2023 · most notably Magwood v. Patterson (2010), Medberry v. Crosby (2003)
20 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · McCleskey v. Zant · Ford v. Wainwright · Felker v. Turpin · Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) the claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on- collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or (B) (i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence; and (ii) the facts underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable fact finder would have found the applicant guilty of the underlying offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“at § 2244(b)), overruled in unrelated part by Woodford v. Garceau, 538 U.S. 202, 123 S.Ct. 1398, 155 L.Ed.2d 363 (2003); Crouch v. Norris, 251 F.3d 720 , 723-25 (8th Cir.2001) (applying abuse of the writ principles to assess prisoner's challenge to the execution of his sentence); Muniz v. United States, 236 F.3d 122 , 127 (2d Cir.2001) (per curiam) (defining second or successive”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Allen v. Ornoski“[t]he Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit, and our sister circuits have interpreted the concept incorporated in this term of art as derivative of the `abuse-of-the-writ' doctrine developed in pre-AEDPA cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Allen v. Ornoski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.