Presnick v. Bysiewicz’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Dunn v. Blumstein · Weinstein v. Bradford · Murphy v. Hunt · Storer v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While pro se complaints are held to less exacting standards than pleadings drafted by lawyers, plaintiff, a former attorney, is not entitled to the considerations accorded a typical pro se plaintiff,”); Bertucci v. Brown, 663 F.Supp. 447, 449 (E.D.N.Y. 1987) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Polidi v. Bannon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.