Sanchez v. Launch Technical Workforce Solutions, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1681 · 15 U.S.C. § 1681B · 15 U.S.C. § 1681P · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Thomas v. Arn · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because of the unitary nature of that class claim, the Court perceives no unfairness in haling the defendant into court to answer to it in a forum that has specific jurisdiction over the defendant based on the representative's claim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“defendant is presented with a unitary, coherent claim to which it need respond only with a unitary, coherent defense”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]f due process was not offended in Shutts , a class-action in State court with absent non-resident plaintiff class members, 472 U.S. at 808 , 105 S.Ct. 2965 , it is not offended by a potential class-action in federal court where the plaintiff class is made up in part with non-resident members.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.