Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 297 ILL 374 - Pradelt v. Lewis

Pradelt v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
9
states following
October 1999
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 1999 · most notably 4 Ill. App. 3d 549 - Walgreen Co. v. American National Bank & Trust Co. (1972), Johnson v. Killian (1946)

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

7019211930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harrington v. McCarthy · Gulick v. Hamilton · Turney v. Shriver · Norwalk Heating & Lighting Co. v. Vernam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * as ordinarily used, the term ‘irreparable’ means that it cannot be repaired or restored or adequately compensated for in money or the compensation can not be safely measured; that an injury which tends to the destruction of an estate, or which is of such a character as to work the destruction of the property as it has been held and enjoyed, will be treated as irreparable.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.