State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Ward · Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. · State v. Pabst · Lothian Cassidy, L.L.C. v. Lothian Oil Inc. · State v. McCaslin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When sufficiency of the evidence is challenged in a criminal case, the standard of review is whether, after reviewing all the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, the appellate court is convinced a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Appellate courts do not reweigh evidence, resolve evidentiary conflicts, or make witness credibility determinations.” State v. Harris, 297 Kan. 1076, 1081 , 306 P.3d 282 (2013) (citing State v. Qualls, 297 Kan. 61 , Syl. ¶ 1, 298 P.3d 311 [2013]).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lopez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.