Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 297 KAN 126 - State v. Stimec

State v. Stimec’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · State v. King · State v. McCaslin · State v. Brown · State v. Raskie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for a prosecutor to comment on facts not in evidence, to divert the jury's attention from its role as factfinder, or to make comments that serve no purpose other than to inflame the passions and prejudices of the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.