Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Martinez v. State (1987), Goldsmith v. State (1995)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Dennis v. United States · Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. United States · State v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Because this case does not involve any change in the Maryland law, a defendant’s failure to demand an available grand jury transcript, and to preserve an objection to the trial court’s failure to require its production, clearly implicates the waiver provisions of Curtis v. State, 284 Md. 132, 145-150 , 395 A.2d 464 (1978).” 297. Md. at 25, n. 1, 464 A.2d at 985, n. 1 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Calhoun“after a State’s witness has testified on direct examination, a defendant is entitled to inspect the grand jury testimony for cross-examination purposes without any requirement that he show any other need.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he rule of secrecy surrounding grand jury proceedings is a product of the common law and “is designed to protect the jury from outside interference or pressure[.]””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.