Bushouse v. Brom’s Empirical Analysis
1941
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 1968
20 state decisions — followed in 15 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Clute · Askowith v. Massell · Foley v. McDonald · Hale v. . Hale · Wright v. Osborne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * * we think it is always important to ascertain, if possible, what it was that primarily motivated the undertaking.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.