Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 297 Minn. 430 - State v. Hogan

State v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

123
cited by 123 later decisions
13
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

123 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 123 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably State v. Swain (1978), Firestone v. Crown Center Redevelopment Corp. (1985)

123 state decisions — followed in 13 states

49019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gault · Parham v. Cortese · 67 Cal. 2d 365 - People v. Lara · Henry v. Mississippi · Salsburg v. State of Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The seriousness of the offense in terms of community protection; (2) the circumstances surrounding the offense; (3) whether the offense was committed in an aggressive, violent, premeditated, or willful manner; (4) whether the offense was directed against persons or property; (5) the reasonably foreseeable consequences of the act; and (6) the absence of adequate protective and security facilities available to the juvenile treatment system.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he court finds that the child is not suitable to treatment or that the public safety is not served under the provisions of laws relating to juvenile courts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““We hold that the determination whether a waiver of rights is voluntary and intelligently made by a juvenile is a fact question dependent upon the totality of the circumstances. The child’s age, maturity, intelligence, education, experience, and ability to comprehend are all factors to be considered in addition to the presence and competence of his parents during waiver.” State v. Hogan, 297 Minn. 430, 440 , 212 N.W.2d 664, 671 (1973).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.