Petet v. McClanahan’s Empirical Analysis
1923
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2012
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Huling v. Kaw Val Ry Imp Co · Johnson v. Beazley · Lingo v. Burford · Darrow v. Chicago, Lake Shore & South Bend Railroad · Kansas City v. Duncan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“within twenty days after the last day of said publication”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to condemn private property for public road purpose”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in such manner as may be prescribed by law,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.