Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 297 N.C. 121 - State v. Jolly

State v. Jolly’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

107
cited by 107 later decisions
2
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 105 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably State v. Holden (1987), State v. Brown (1982)

2 federal appellate · 105 state decisions

49019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · State v. McKinney · State v. Harris · State v. Tippett · State v. Potter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any act or force, however, slight, `employed to effect an entrance through any usual or unusual place of ingress, whether open, partly open, or closed.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “statutory offense of felonious breaking or entering is a lesser included offense of burglary in the first and second degree,” State v. Jolly, 297 N.C. 121 , 254 S.E.2d 1 , 5 (1979), which”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Hence, leaving the verdict undisturbed but recognizing it for what it is, the judgment upon the verdict of guilty of first degree rape is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Superior Court, New Hanover County, for pronouncement of a judgment as upon a verdict of guilty of second degree rape. The Clerk of the Superior Court, New Hanover County, shall thereupon issue a revised commitment with respect to the revised judgment on the first count in case number 80CRS5873 bearing the same date as the original commit ment for first degree rape. The effect will be, and it is so intended, that defendant will receive credit upon the new commitment for all the time heretofore served for first degree rape.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.