Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 297 NW2D 126 - State v. Meizo

State v. Meizo’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Ventresca · Barrett v. United States · Time, Inc. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc. · Wilkins v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc. · Commonwealth v. Milliken

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I wish to emphasize the fact that it is not only preferable but most desirable that testimony be recorded at the time of the probable cause determination by the magistrate. The failure to do so can lead to situations where the magistrate may subsequently be called upon to give testimony on behalf of the prosecution to validate the nature of the proceedings. I regard this as not serving the best interests of the judicial system because it places the judicial branch of government as a witness of the executive branch of the government.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.