State v. Cordier’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2013
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Cheff v. Schnackenberg · State v. Andrus · State v. Dorsey · State v. Gladden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is generally stated that the matter of permitting recross-examination is in the sound discretion of the trial judge and in the absence of some showing of an abuse of that discretion, and resulting prejudice, his ruling will not be disturbed on appeal. State v. Shirley, 256 La. 665 , 237 So.2d 676 (1970), cert. den., 401 U.S. 926 , 91 S.Ct. 891 , 27 L.Ed.2d 829 ; State v. Byrd, 214 La. 713 , 38 So. 2d 395 (1949); State v. Fernandez, 157 La. 149 , 102 So. 186 (1924).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lee“to show one of the necessary elements of the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.