Eubank v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1927
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1929
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on City of Dallas v. Maxwell · Darragh v. Barmore · Adams v. Williams · Dulin v. Moore · St. Paul's Sanitarium v. Freeman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As a codicil to the foregoing will, I desire to make the following additional provisions, to-wit: “While in no manner desiring to restrict of limit the right and powers of my granddaughter, Mattie Laura Steedman, to dispose of the property devised to her, provided she disposes of the same during her lifetime. I nevertheless will and direct that if she die without leaving heirs of her body, all property she may have received under and by virtue of my will shall immediately vest in my daughters, Anna Rainey and Juliet F. Moore, and my son, A. B. Moore, in equal portions, share and share alike. And should my daughter, Juliet F. Moore, not then'be living, then the said Anna Rainey and A. B. Moore shall take the whole of said property. The children of the said Anna Rainey and A. B. Moore to take the places of their respective parents in ease of their death.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Eubank v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.