Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco))
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Brinegar v. United States · Ornelas v. United States · Adams v. Williams · Alabama v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court of appeals erred to hold that a Rule 702 Kelly [v. State, 824 S.W.2d 568 (Tex.Crim.App.1992) ] gatek-eeping hearing is required to show the reliability of LIDAR technology to measure speed at a hearing on a motion to suppress. Nevertheless, the court of appeals correctly held that the trial judge abused his discretion when denying Hall's suppression motion because there was no evidence that LIDAR technology, as used in this case, supplied probable cause for the stop.”). See also id. at 300-01 (Price, J., concurring) (setting out the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex Parte Gutierrez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.