State v. Rhine’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth))
Relationships
Relies on Hudson v. United States · Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan · Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc. · Field v. Clark · Guzman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“judicial review ensures that the administrative agency’s rules and other actions actually conform to the legislative standards.”). 62 . See Land v. State, 581 S.W.2d 672, 673 (Tex.Crim.App.1979) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Martinez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.