Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 297 SW3D 512 - State v. Moreno

State v. Moreno’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 23rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · King v. State · Watson v. State · Lagrone v. State · Reyes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “THE STATE: Lastly, if this Court decides to keep with its original decision and while ordering a new trial, then the State would ask for Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in order to ascertain what the basis was so we can then pursue an appeal. THE COURT: Okay. And I think I can just cut the chase on that. THE STATE: Okay. THE COURT: It’s in the interest of justice. After hearing this case, it was one that stayed on my mind. I didn’t have to think about it too long when the Motion was submitted because I questioned the case at the time of trial; and so, I am going to grant a new trial in the interest of justice and the issue that it’s a new trial. It’s not punishment. I will — it’s the guilt. Okay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.