Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

297 S.W.3d 604

Buehler v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 2009

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2009-09-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2019

1 state decisions

Relies on Zalmanoff v. Zalmanoff

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-09-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Kenneth Paul Smith appeals from the trial court’s judgments awarding Joan Buehler a portion of his monthly pension benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Zalmanoff v. Zalmanoff, 862 S.W.2d 941, 944 (Mo.App. E.D.1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

/297/sw3d/604 · .json · Public domain