Treaster v. Betts’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Compliance with Rule 84.04 briefing requirements is mandatory in order to ensure that appellate courts do not become advocates by speculating on facts and on arguments that have not been made. Deficient points rélied on force the appellate court to search the argument portion of the brief or 'the record itself to determine and clarify the appellant’s assertions, thereby wasting judicial resources,” and, worse yet, creating the danger that the appellate court will interpret the appellant’s contention differently than the appellant intended or his opponent understood,”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ellen L. Nicol v. David L. Nicol · Wallace v. Frazier

2. “The point shall be in substantially the following form: "The trial court erred in [ identify the challenged ruling or action ], because [ state the legal reasons for the claim of reversible error ], in that [ explain why the legal reasons, in the context of the case, support the claim of reversible error ]."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Wallace v. Frazier

3. “to give notice to the opposing party of the precise matters which must be contended with and to inform the court of the issues presented for review.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Wallace v. Frazier