Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 297 U.S. 175 - United States v. California

United States v. California’s Empirical Analysis

297 U.S. 175 · 1936

Citation profile

748
cited by 748 later decisions
110
cited 110 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

283 federal appellate · 40 district · 102 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 748 later decisions (110 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2011 · most notably Will v. Michigan Department of State Police (1989), United States v. United Mine Workers of America (1947)

283 federal appellate · 40 district · 102 state decisions — followed in 16 states

1700193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedCalifornia v. United States (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Houston East West Texas Railway Company v. United States · Murray v. Wilson Distilling Co. · Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell · Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 748 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[This] presumption is an aid to consistent construction of statutes of the enacting sovereign when their purpose is in doubt, but it does not require that the aim of a statute fairly to be inferred be disregarded because not explicitly stated.”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “corporate character or declared purposes”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any common carrier engaged in interstate commerce by railroad”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.