Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 297 U.S. 88 - United States v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co.

United States v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co.’s Empirical Analysis

297 U.S. 88 · 1936

Citation profile

376
cited by 376 later decisions
20
cited 20 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

184 federal appellate · 23 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 376 later decisions (20 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Rutkin v. United States (1952), Hassett v. Welch (1938)

184 federal appellate · 23 district · 13 state decisions

9901936194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Eisner v. Macomber · North American Oil Consolidated v. Burnet · Lucas v. American Code Co. · Towne v. Eisner · Doyle v. Mitchell Bros.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 376 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Income within the meaning of the Sixteenth Amendment is the fruit that is born of capital, not the potency of fruition. With few exceptions, if any, it is income as the word is known in the common speech of men.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We have said of that act that it reveals in its provisions an intention on the part of Congress to reach ‘pretty much every sort of income subject to the federal power.’ Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda Bank, 293 U.S. 84, 89 , 55 S.Ct. 50, 52 , 79 L.Ed. 211 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “* * * The case is not to be confused with one where the basis of the suit is an injury to capital, with the result that the recovery is never income, no matter when collected. * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.